This case involving young protesters has indeed stirred widespread concern and criticism, reflecting a strong public backlash against the Federal Government’s response to the #EndBadGovernance protesters. The charges—spanning from terrorism to mutiny—appear severe, particularly given the ages of those involved, and have drawn attention to the implications of prosecuting minors in such a high-profile manner. The reported health conditions of the detained youths have further intensified public scrutiny.
Attorney General Lateef Fagbemi’s intervention suggests a potential reassessment of how the case proceeds, with a directive to the Director of Public Prosecutions to explore options for an earlier hearing. This move may indicate an effort to balance legal proceedings with the public’s call for a more humane approach, particularly given the ages and conditions of the detainees. However, Fagbemi’s clarification on the inability to alter the court’s decisions emphasizes the limited scope of his influence within the judiciary’s processes.
Justice Egwuatu’s decision to grant bail, although set at a substantial amount of N10 million per individual protester, along with surety conditions for minors, adds another layer to the unfolding narrative. It highlights the judiciary’s balancing act between upholding laws around public order and addressing humanitarian concerns, especially for minors.
This situation has undoubtedly become a focal point for civil society groups and opposition figures calling for accountability and a more measured response from the government. The coming days could see further developments, particularly around the public outcry for an expedited hearing and improved care for the protesters that are minors in custody.
Click here to join our Telegram Channel